Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Gone |
2 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Walrath |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
15 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Novins |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
15 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.