Domain subsection | Factors considered | Don't do | Do poorly | Do inconsistently | Do with some consistency | Do well | No answer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III. Can we tell if the research is reliable and of high quality? | 1. Staff have critical appraisal skills for evaluating the quality of research | 6 (24%) | 6 (24%) | 8 (32%) | 4 (16%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4%) |
 | 2. Staff have critical appraisal skills for evaluating the reliability of research | 8 (32%) | 5 (20%) | 5 (20%) | 3 (12%) | 1 (4%) | 3 (12%) |
 | 3. Links with external experts who use critical appraisal skills and tools to evaluate the quality and reliability of research | 7 (28%) | 6 (24%) | 4 (16%) | 3 (12%) | 2 (8%) | 3 (12%) |
IV. Can we tell if the research is relevant and applicable? | 1. Ability of staff to relate research to their organization | 2 (8%) | 6 (24%) | 8 (32%) | 6 (24%) | 2 (8%) | 1 (4%) |
 | 2. Links with external experts to help determine whether research is relevant to the organization | 8 (32%) | 7 (28%) | 5 (20%) | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (12%) |