Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Michie |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paschal Sheeran |
| 21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou |
| 26 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Russell Glasgow |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Michie |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Michie |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 17 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Michie |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 17 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.