Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Marshall |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 9 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Sevdalis |
| 10 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Hillman |
| 27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael DeVita |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 21 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Marshall |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Sevdalis |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Marshall |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 4 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Marshall |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 4 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| 8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Marshall |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-39 |
You can find further information about peer review here.