From: Bridging the gap between basic science and clinical practice: a role for community clinicians
Early phase one interviewsa | Later phase two interviewsb | Type of intervieweec | Number of interviews (total = 243) |
---|---|---|---|
Incentives and disincentives for provider participation, including organizational barriers and motivators | Best practices in community research networks, and how new provider networks might partner with these | Community clinicians (Individual primary care clinicians, dentists, nurse practitioners) and clinician organizations (health plans, large community practices) not currently participating in research | 37 |
Strategies for provider participation and retention | Proposed provider effort as complementary to or in competition with existing clinician organizations; Liability and marketing concerns | Individual clinicians and health provider organizations already participating in clinical research | 30 |
Ethical and professional issues | Optimal design for studies in community practices; Costs associated with conducting various types of clinical research studies in community settings | Leaders and coordinators of clinical research networks (e.g., CCOPs, AMC leaders, PBRNs) | 80 |
Advantages and limitations of different types of research networks/organizations by study and provider type and the potential role of emerging information systems | Governance, oversight, and quality control for NCRA | Representatives of private-sector organizations (e.g., CROs) and stakeholders (e.g., professional associations, pharmaceutical companies) with relevant experience and interest | 77 |
Specific recommendations to NIH on design of physician recruitment and incentives | Addressing privacy, HIPAA and institutional review boards issues | Representatives of public and government entities (e.g., leaders from NIH institutes and other federal agencies) with relevant experience and interest | 19 |