Skip to main content

Table 11 Professional interventions: Nominated research ideas

From: The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: What do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviews

Type of intervention

Research ideas

Educational outreach visits (EOV)/audit and feedback (AF)

Better quality trials directly evaluating specific modalities and methods of EOV (proper randomization, baseline data, variety of outcomes--including patient outcomes and costing)

 

Better quality trials directly evaluating specific modalities and methods of methods of AF (as above)

 

For which clinicians, clinical conditions, and stage in the continuum is EOV most impactful?

 

For which clinicians, clinical conditions, and stage in the continuum is AF most impactful?

 

What is the impact of regional AF versus individual AF on changing patterns of practice?

IT/IM/informatic interventions

Better quality trials directly evaluating specific modalities and methods of informatic interventions (proper randomization

 

For which clinicians, clinical conditions, and stage in the continuum are informatics interventions most impactful?

 

Develop methods to enable practice guidelines to be directly integrated into informatic interventions

 

What is the cost effectiveness of different informatic interventions?

 

Are informatic interventions effective in non-drug-prescribing aspects of cancer care?

Local opinion leader interventions

Methodological development in choosing local opinion leaders in a reliable manner

 

Methodological development in understanding factors that increase and decrease sustainability of local opinion leader designation

 

Research to better understand for which provider groups and under what clinical contexts (cancer diagnosis, practice setting, stage of the cancer trajectory) local opinion leaders are most effective

Tailored interventions

Methodological analysis of the operational techniques of tailoring in existing high-quality primary studies

 

Methodological development to determine when tailoring has or has not addressed identified barriers

 

Identification of defining factors of effective tailoring

 

Direct comparisons of different tailoring interventions (tactic and modality, etc.) on uptake of evidence, processes of care, and clinical outcomes

Clinical pathway interventions

Testing of clinical pathway interventions on different stages of continuum of cancer care

 

Testing of clinical pathway interventions with different healthcare providers involved in cancer control

 

Methodological development to determine for which clinical problem (e.g., cancer diagnosis, complexity of care) clinical pathways are most effective

 

Direct comparisons of different clinical pathway strategies (methods and modality, etc.) on uptake of evidence, processes of care, and clinical outcomes

 

Is the introduction of clinical pathways cost effective in Ontario/Canada?

Guidelines

Compare and contrast use of and impact of guidelines on processes of care and clinical outcome as a function of cancer care provider

 

Testing innovative strategies to disseminate guideline messages to different providers

 

Testing of innovative strategies to disseminate guideline messages to administrators

 

Testing of innovate strategies to disseminate guideline messages to policy makers

Discharge planning

What are the defining features/components to a discharge plan that are linked to patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, process outcomes, and clinical outcomes?

 

Determining the specific clinical components for discharge plans for different cancer diagnoses

  1. IT = information technology; IM = information management.