Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown |
18 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charles Filanosky |
8 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown |
11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
24 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Rubenstein |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
24 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
27 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-121 |
You can find further information about peer review here.