Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
8 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Daly |
10 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ivaylo Vassilev |
7 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Daly |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ivaylo Vassilev |
2 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
29 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lawrence Palinkas |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
29 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
29 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-113 |
You can find further information about peer review here.