Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mathieu Ouimet |
| 23 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bridie Kent |
| 25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bridie Kent |
| 29 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 27 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 27 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 7 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 7 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-106 |
You can find further information about peer review here.