Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping

Original Submission
23 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Hetrick
12 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciana Ballini
24 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley
28 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Hetrick
6 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 3
6 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 7
23 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
2 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 9
2 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
7 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-104

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page