Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Catrine Eldh |
30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joyce Wilkinson |
4 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neale Smith |
5 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Curran |
17 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joyce Wilkinson |
25 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Catrine Eldh |
28 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Curran |
30 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neale Smith |
11 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
30 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nadine Wathen |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
30 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
6 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-102 |
You can find further information about peer review here.