Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 1 Fidelity of implementation (FOI) ratings from qualitative ratings

From: Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure

Facility FOI Ratingsafor Program Components Averageb
FOI
FOI rank
  1c 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   
A 4 3 -- 3 1 3 5 5 3.4 2
B 4 4 4 5 3 -- 3 2 3.6 4
C 3 3 4 4 1 5 3 5 3.5 3
D 3 3 3 4 1 -- 5 2 3.0 1
Variance 0.33 0.25 0.33 0.67 1.00 2.00 1.33 3.00   
  1. Blank cells: ---, indicates missing data
  2. aRatings: 1 = nonuse, 2 = low compliance, 3 = compliant, 4 = high compliance, 5 = committed; btotal FOI rating was calculated by summing ratings across components and dividing by the number of components for which ratings were made; ccomponents: 1 = availability of a nurse practitioner (NP) case manager, 2 = collaboration between primary care providers and NP case managers, 3 = coordination between primary care (referring) centers and inpatient (referral) centers, 4 = provision of video conferencing sessions, 5 = provision of telemedicine technology, 6 = provision of patient education documentation, 7 = provision of laptop computers, 8 = provision of case manager training.
  3. -- indicates missing data.