Skip to main content

Table 1 Fidelity of implementation (FOI) ratings from qualitative ratings

From: Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure

Facility

FOI Ratingsafor Program Components

Averageb

FOI

FOI rank

 

1c

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

  

A

4

3

--

3

1

3

5

5

3.4

2

B

4

4

4

5

3

--

3

2

3.6

4

C

3

3

4

4

1

5

3

5

3.5

3

D

3

3

3

4

1

--

5

2

3.0

1

Variance

0.33

0.25

0.33

0.67

1.00

2.00

1.33

3.00

  
  1. Blank cells: ---, indicates missing data
  2. aRatings: 1 = nonuse, 2 = low compliance, 3 = compliant, 4 = high compliance, 5 = committed; btotal FOI rating was calculated by summing ratings across components and dividing by the number of components for which ratings were made; ccomponents: 1 = availability of a nurse practitioner (NP) case manager, 2 = collaboration between primary care providers and NP case managers, 3 = coordination between primary care (referring) centers and inpatient (referral) centers, 4 = provision of video conferencing sessions, 5 = provision of telemedicine technology, 6 = provision of patient education documentation, 7 = provision of laptop computers, 8 = provision of case manager training.
  3. -- indicates missing data.