Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations calculated as Spearman's rho

From: Factors influencing success in quality-improvement collaboratives: development and psychometric testing of an instrument

   Support from expert team Multidisciplinary team, improvement model Collaborative process
Sufficient expert panel support Correlation coefficient 1.000   
  Significance (two-tailed test)    
Effective multidisciplinary teamwork Correlation coefficient .230* 1.000  
  Significance (two-tailed test) .050 .  
Helpful collaborative processes Correlation coefficient .410** .323** 1.000
  Significance (two-tailed test) .000 .004  
  1. *Correlation is significant at the .05 level (two-tailed test); **Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed test).