Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations calculated as Spearman's rho

From: Factors influencing success in quality-improvement collaboratives: development and psychometric testing of an instrument

  

Support from expert team

Multidisciplinary team, improvement model

Collaborative process

Sufficient expert panel support

Correlation coefficient

1.000

  
 

Significance (two-tailed test)

   

Effective multidisciplinary teamwork

Correlation coefficient

.230*

1.000

 
 

Significance (two-tailed test)

.050

.

 

Helpful collaborative processes

Correlation coefficient

.410**

.323**

1.000

 

Significance (two-tailed test)

.000

.004

 
  1. *Correlation is significant at the .05 level (two-tailed test); **Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed test).