Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 25 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurie Lindamer |
| 11 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Sevdalis |
| 21 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Kauth |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nick Sevdalis |
| 2 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurie Lindamer |
| 19 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Kauth |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 1 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Kauth |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 1 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 28 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Kauth |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 12 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Kauth |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-75 |
You can find further information about peer review here.