Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicky Dekker |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicky Dekker |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicky Dekker |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
21 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicky Dekker |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
20 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicky Dekker |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
20 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.