Elements | Short definitions |
---|---|
A. Assess barriers and supports | |
Local context | |
   • Work environment | Factors such as rules, regulations, available resources, and support |
   • Work pressure | Fit between EIPCP work load and receptivity of involved professionals |
   • Competing demands | Multiple pressures calling for practice change and importance of EIPCP and time constraints |
Recommendations form BPGs | Â |
   • Intervention source | Professionals' perception of whether the EIPCP is an externally or internally driven intervention |
   • Benefits ratio | Professionals' perception of the added value for themselves and for the service users |
   • Adaptability | The extent to which recommendations can be adapted to fit the dynamics of the local context |
   • Usefulness | Perceived usefulness of recommendations from BPGs and others sources of evidence |
Adopters | Â |
   • Knowledge | Professionals' definition and concepts related to collaborative practice and anticipated outcome of EIPCP |
   • Current practice | Fit between EIPCP, perceived quality of care process and shared decision making |
   • Beliefs/Attitudes | Value that professionals place on EIPCP and perception of responsibilities regarding care |
B. Monitor degree of use | |
   • Operational processes | Sequence of events illustrating how cancer team members perform collaborative care planning and shared decision making, |
   • Relational processes | Sequence of events illustrating how cancer team members interact, communicate and negotiate shared intervention zone |
   • Adaptive processes | Sequence of events illustrating how cancer team members enact changes in order to enhance collaborative practices |