Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ellie Grossman |
19 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith McInnes |
5 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Haggstrom |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
17 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ellie Grossman |
16 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Haggstrom |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Haggstrom |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Haggstrom |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
4 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.