Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care

Original Submission
10 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Debbie Tolson
26 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley
11 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 7
13 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 9
17 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
19 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone
Resubmission - Version 11
19 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
26 May 2010 Editorially accepted
26 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-38

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page