Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project

Original Submission
28 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
12 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosie Forster
2 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Karen Gardner
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
14 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosie Forster
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karen Gardner
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karen Gardner
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
11 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karen Gardner
Resubmission - Version 8
11 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
13 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
13 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-21

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908