Skip to main content

Table 4 Scores by item of the AGREE instrument

From: Production and quality of clinical practice guidelines in Argentina (1994–2004): a cross-sectional study

Domains and items of the AGREE instrument

Median value

Interquartile range

Domain 1: Scope and purpose

  

1. The overall objective(s) of the guideline is (are) specifically described

1.5

1.5

2. The clinical question(s) covered by the guideline is (are) specifically described

2

1

3. The patients to whom the guideline is meant to apply are specifically described

2.5

1.5

Domain 2: Stakeholder involvement

  

4. The guideline development group includes individuals from all the relevant professional groups

1.5

1

5. The patients' views and preferences have been sought

1

0.5

6. The target users of the guideline are clearly defined

1

1

7. The guideline has been piloted among end users

1

0

Domain 3: Rigour of development

  

8. The systematic methods were used to search for evidence

1

0

9. The criteria for selecting the evidence are clearly described

1

0

10. The methods used for formulating the recommendations are clearly described

1.5

0.5

11. The health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered in formulating the recommendations

2

1

12. There is an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence

1

1

13. The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to its publication

1

0.5

14. A procedure for updating the guideline is provided

1

0

Domain 4: Clarity and presentation

  

15. The recommendations are specific and unambiguous

2.5

1.5

16. The different options for management of the condition are clearly presented

2.5

1.5

17. Key recommendations are easily identifiable

2.5

1.5

18. The guideline is supported with tools for application

1

0.5

Domain 5: Applicability

  

19. The potential organizational barriers in applying the recommendations have been discussed

1

0.5

20. The potential cost implications of applying the recommendations have been considered

1

0

21. The guideline presents key review criteria for monitoring and/or audit purposes

1

1

Domain 6: Editorial independence

  

22. The guideline is editorially independent from the funding body

1

0

23. Conflicts of interest of guideline development members have been recorded

1

0