Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Michie |
7 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maggie Toplak |
29 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Michie |
26 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Eccles |
13 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
15 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
10 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
10 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
25 Apr 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Apr 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-23 |
You can find further information about peer review here.