Peer Review reports
From: Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Graham |
| 9 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heather Buchan |
| 19 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 30 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Graham |
| 28 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heather Buchan |
| 22 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 22 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Feb 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 Feb 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Robert Hanney |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Feb 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Feb 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-2-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.