Table 1 (Abstract P58) Descriptive statistics of clinical sustainability sub-domains
From: Proceedings of the 6th UK and Ireland implementation science research conference
Domain | Community paramedics (n=7) | Clinicians and members of the care team (n=50) | Administrators (n=6) | All respondents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
Organizational Readiness | 4.45 (1.15) | 5.22 (0.96) | 4.97 (1.04) | 5.11 (0.99) |
Organizational systems are in place to support the various needs of the CACP program | 3.25 (1.26) | 5.05 (1.25) | 5.17 (1.94) | 4.91 (1.41) |
The CACP program fits in well with the culture of the team | 6.00 (0.82) | 6.36 (0.84) | 6.50 (0.55) | 6.35 (0.81) |
The CACP program has feasible and sufficient resources (e.g., time, space, funding) to achieve its goals | 4.00 (1.63) | 4.74 (1.51) | 3.67 (1.21) | 4.51 (1.50) |
The CACP program has adequate staff to achieve its goals | 4.50 (1.00) | 4.59 (1.32) | 3.67 (1.22) | 4.45 (1.29) |
The CACP program is well integrated into the operations of the organization | 4.50 (2.65) | 5.11 (1.49) | 5.83 (0.98) | 5.15 (1.49) |
Workflow Integration | 5.30 (0.71) | 5.70 (0.93) | 5.52 (1.03) | 5.66 (0.93) |
The CACP program is built into the clinical workflow | 4.50 (1.00) | 4.89 (1.49) | 5.00 (1.41) | 4.87 (1.42) |
The CACP program is easy for clinicians to use | 4.00 (0.82) | 5.68 (1.33) | 6.00 (1.23) | 5.57 (1.36) |
The CACP program integrates well with established clinical practices | 5.25 (1.71) | 5.92 (1.04) | 5.67 (1.37) | 5.83 (1.13) |
The CACP program aligns well with other clinical systems (e.g., electronic health record) | 5.25 (1.71) | 6.11 (0.99) | 5.67 (1.86) | 5.98 (1.19) |
The CACP program is designed to be used consistently | 4.75 (1.71) | 5.68 (1.27) | 5.50 (0.84) | 5.57 (1.26) |
Outcomes & Effectiveness | 4.35 (1.10) | 6.18 (0.88) | 5.56 (1.25) | 5.91 (1.09) |
The practice has evidence of beneficial outcomes | 5.00 (0.00) | 6.21 (1.08) | 5.67 (1.75) | 6.02 (1.19) |
The practice is associated with improvement in patient outcomes that are clinically meaningful | 4.75 (0.50) | 6.27 (0.90) | 6.50 (0.84) | 6.17 (0.96) |
The practice is clearly linked to positive health or clinical outcomes | 4.00 (1.16) | 6.11 (0.94) | 6.33 (1.21) | 5.96 (1.14) |
The practice is cost-effective | 4.00 (1.83) | 6.00 (1.12) | 5.00 (1.55) | 5.67 (1.38) |
The practice has clear advantages over alternatives | 4.00 (2.31) | 6.43 (0.73) | 4.60 (1.14) | 6.02 (1.27) |
Overall Mean by Group | 4.30 | 5.64 | 5.42 | 5.49 |