Skip to main content

Table 8 Approaches used to measure CDSS implementation in the 131 studies

From: Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems—a narrative review

Measurement approach and number of studies

Included study references

Self-reported interest in using or intention, willingness to use, adoption (n = 74)

[5, 8, 9, 12, 17, 48, 69, 72, 73, 77, 79, 82,83,84, 87, 90, 91, 93, 95, 96, 100, 105, 106, 108, 109, 111, 113, 116,117,118, 121, 124, 127, 129,130,131,132,133,134,135, 138,139,140,141, 143, 149, 151, 153,154,155, 157,158,159, 162, 163, 165, 166, 168,169,170,171,172, 174, 177,178,179,180, 182, 183, 187, 189, 198,199,200]

Self-reported attitude toward using CDSS (n = 29)

[24, 30, 35, 72, 75, 80, 85, 92, 98, 100, 102, 103, 108, 115, 120, 122, 126, 128, 136, 147, 148, 160, 161, 164, 167, 175, 181, 184, 185]

Self-reported use (n = 7)

[11, 34, 68, 92, 112, 158, 190]

Self-reported satisfaction, performance (n = 5)

[107, 112, 122, 142, 147]

Both self-reported and objective measure of implementation success (n = 21)

[35, 70, 76, 78, 86, 88, 91, 94, 97, 99, 104, 110, 114, 131, 139, 144, 146, 156, 174, 178, 180]

Both self-reported and objective measure of usefulness, usability (n = 1)

[119]

Objective actual use measurement (n = 10)

[74, 89, 92, 96, 102, 104, 137, 186, 188, 189]