Skip to main content

Table 2 Strategy types used in included systematic reviews

From: ‘It depends’: what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice

Strategy type

Number

Authors

Educational strategies

3

Grudniewicz et al. [22]; Koota, Kääriäinen & Melender [23]; Wu et al. [20]

Local opinion leaders

1

Flodgren et al. [24]

Reminders

2

Arditi et al. [25]; Pantoja et al. [26]

ICT focused approaches

3

De Angelis et al. [27]; Brown et al. [28]; Jamal, McKenzie and Clark [14]

Audit and feedback

1

Sykes, McAnuff and Kolehmainen [29]

Non-EPOC listed strategies: Social media, Toolkits

2

Bhatt et al. [30]; Yamada et al. [31]

Multi-faceted interventions (MFIs)

20

Afari-Asiedu et al. [32]; Boonacker et al. [33]; Al Zoubi et al. [34]; Ariyo et al. [35]; Borgert, Goossens and Dongelmans [36]; Cahill et al. [37]; Pedersen et al. [38]; Jenkins et al. [39]; Bennett et al. [40]; Noonan et al. [41]; Yost et al. [21]; Albreacht et al. [42]; Scott et al. [19]; Campbell et al. [43]; Bird et al. [44]; Goorts, Dizon and Milanese [45]; Zadro et al. [46]; Menon et al. [15]; Jones et al. [18]; Van Der Veer et al. [47]

  1. Source: authors