Skip to main content

Table 5 Regression models for association of grant type and A-CRA provider-level reach outcomes

From: Comparing organization-focused and state-focused financing strategies on provider-level reach of a youth substance use treatment model: a mixed-method study

Variable

Estimated association with reach outcome (β, SE)

Any

(n = 164)

First-level

(n = 164)

Full

(n = 164)

Supervisor

(n = 149)

State-focused grant (vs. organization-focused)

− 0.27 (.11)

p = .01*

− 0.23 (.11)

p = .04*

− 0.15 (.11)

p = .18

− 0.06 (.15)

p = .69

# of providers trained

0.01 (.01)

p = .39

0.01 (.01)

p = .26

0.00 (.01)

p = .95

0.02 (.01)

p = .02*

# of supervisors who pursued certification

− 0.02 (.02)

p = .31

− 0.02 (.02)

p = .25

− 0.02 (.02)

p = .44

− 0.09 (.03)

p < .01**

Turnover rate

− 0.2 (.08)

p = .01*

− 0.17 (.08)

p = .03*

− 0.15 (.09)

p = .08

− 0.02 (.13)

p = .85

Grant end date

0.00 (.00)

p = .33

0.00 (.00)

p = .61

0.01 (.00)

p = .16

− 0.01 (.01)

p = .31

Length of grant period

0.00 (.00)

p = .62

0.00 (.00)

p = .72

0.00 (.00)

p = .69

− 0.01 (.01)

p = .29

Constant

1.05 (.22)

p < .01**

0.82 (.22)

p < .01**

0.12 (.23)

p = .62

1.10 (.32)

p < .01**

R2

.33

.22

.05

.17

  1. A-CRA Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach
  2. *Significant at p < .05 level
  3. **Significant at p < .01 level