Skip to main content

Table 3 Design and methodological approaches identified in implementation outcomes research (n = 400)

From: Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review

 

All

Acceptability

Adoption

Appropriateness

Cost

Feasibility

Fidelity

Penetration

Sustainability

(n = 400)

(n = 210)

(n = 106)

(n = 87)

(n = 31)

(n = 154)

(n = 157)

(n = 64)

(n = 63)

Design

 Instrument development

5.3%

2.9%

3.8%

4.6%

3.2%

4.5%

6.4%

1.6%

1.6%

 Observational

66.5%

70.0%

67.0%

71.3%

67.7%

73.4%

58.0%

76.6%

82.5%

 Quasi-experimental

6.8%

7.1%

9.4%

8.0%

6.5%

6.5%

6.4%

7.8%

14.3%

 Experimental

21.5%

20.0%

19.8%

16.1%

22.6%

15.6%

29.3%

14.1%

1.6%

Number of observations

 Cross-sectional

42.8%

45.2%

40.6%

47.1%

38.7%

42.2%

29.3%

43.8%

44.4%

 Pre-post

15.3%

22.4%

17.0%

17.2%

12.9%

21.4%

16.6%

12.5%

12.7%

 Longitudinal (> 3)

36.5%

29.0%

38.7%

29.9%

45.2%

31.2%

47.8%

42.2%

41.3%

Type of data used to assess

 Qualitative

17.5%

33.3%

19.8%

44.8%

19.4%

23.4%

13.4%

12.5%

28.6%

 Quantitative

48.5%

37.1%

66.0%

24.1%

67.7%

48.1%

66.2%

68.8%

44.4%

 Multi/mixed

32.5%

28.6%

12.3%

29.9%

12.9%

27.9%

17.2%

17.2%

23.8%

Role in analysis

 Descriptive (e.g., univariate)

62.5%

87.6%

78.3%

92.0%

87.1%

87.0%

68.8%

76.6%

79.4%

 Correlation (e.g., association)

8.3%

6.2%

12.3%

4.6%

3.2%

5.2%

12.7%

14.1%

19.0%

 Independent variable (e.g., predictor)

4.5%

3.8%

3.8%

2.3%

3.2%

1.3%

9.6%

6.3%

3.2%

 Dependent variable (e.g., outcome)

24.3%

11.0%

19.8%

8.0%

12.9%

11.7%

29.3%

23.4%

22.2%