|  | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Phase 1 | Phase 2a |
---|
Implementation Status | N | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) |
---|
Start-Up Status | 1287 | 0.72 (0.37) | 0.38 (0.45) | 0.34 (0.42) | 0.41 (0.39) | Â |
Discontinued | 832 | 0.59 (0.39) | 0.11 (0.26) | 0.06 (0.16) | 0.15 (0.18) | Â |
Achieved | 455 | 0.97 (0.13) | 0.89 (0.21) | 0.85 (0.23) | 0.88 (0.19) | Â |
Competence Status | 1105 | 0.69 (0.38) | 0.30 (0.41) | 0.24 (0.38) | 0.33 (0.36) | 0.22 (0.38) |
Discontinued | 943 | 0.63 (0.39) | 0.19 (0.35) | 0.14 (0.28) | 0.23 (0.28) | 0.10 (0.26) |
Achieved | 162 | 0.99 (0.06) | 0.89 (0.22) | 0.87 (0.22) | 0.89 (0.17) | 0.91 (0.12) |
- Stage 1 = Engagement. Stage 2 = Consideration of Feasibility. Stage 3 = Readiness Planning. Phase 1 = Pre-Implementation. Phase 2 = Implementation
- aSites with a known end-status on the start-up outcome (i.e., they have either achieved start-up or discontinued) may still be ongoing during Phase 2. Since ongoing sites may go on to complete more activities during Phase 2 before achieving competence or discontinuing, the proportion scores for ongoing sites are skewed negative in a manner that misrepresents those sites’ ultimate Phase 2 implementation process fidelity. Therefore, Phase 2 proportion scores are only reported for the subset with a known end-status for achieving competency