Table 1 Survey results
Question | |||
|---|---|---|---|
To what extent was the Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) helpful in… | Mean | SD | % responding either “Moderately” or “Very” |
improving the rigor and reproducibility | 3.05 | .885 | 77.7% |
serving as a “roadmap” for how the project is to be carried out over time | 3.08 | .950 | 74.0% |
clearly reporting and specifying how the project is to be conducted | 2.94 | .909 | 67.8% |
understanding the connections between determinants, strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes | 2.92 | .957 | 66.3% |
identifying gaps in the implementation research logic of their project | 2.86 | 1.021 | 64.2% |
deepening their knowledge of implementation science methods | 2.83 | .959 | 62.9% |
planning the project | 2.82 | 1.088 | 61.3% |
developing consensus and understanding of the project among diverse stakeholders involved | 2.75 | 1.090 | 58.8% |
identifying gaps in new research questions or analyses | 2.54 | 1.032 | 51.3% |
To what extent… | |||
… were the worksheets provided during the summit helpful in completing the IRLM | 3.02 | .886 | 74.1% |
… has your knowledge on the logic of implementation research increased after the two-day training | 3.18 | .827 | 77.6% |