Skip to main content

Table 1 Data collection

From: Prioritising Responses Of Nurses To deteriorating patient Observations (PRONTO) protocol: testing the effectiveness of a facilitation intervention in a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial with an embedded process evaluation and cost analysis

Aim

Variable/Measure

Instrument

Outcomes

Data collection point

1

Adherence to CPG

eCRF

CPG element compliance: completed VS documentation; repeated VS within 30 min; interventions within scope of practice; CRC and MET activations; escalation as per hospital policy.

Baselinea, 6 and 12 monthsb

2

Patient outcomes

eCRF; Hospital clinical databases

Unplanned ICU admissions, cardio-respiratory arrests, limitations of medical treatment orders, HLOS and inpatient mortality.

Baselinea, 6 and 12 monthsb

2

Hospital costs

CRF; Hospital clinical costing databases.

Unplanned ICU admissions, HLOS and inpatient mortality; total cost of hospital episode.

Hospital episodeb

2

Intervention costs

CRF; Staffing salaries

FLIP cost; training frequency

Continuous

3

FLIP dose

eACL

Contact and content of contact.

Continuous

3

Enablers/barriers

eACL/ Ward Communication Books, RISKMAN incidents, Focus groups.

Issues arising; Critical incident analysis.

Continuous

3

Ward Impact

Ward Communication Books, policies and procedures, interviews, field observations.

Frequency and content.

Continuous

3

Facilitator Impact

Interviews with all FLIPS

Perceptions and content.

6 monthsb

  1. aPrior to commencement of intervention (baseline)
  2. bOn completion of intervention (6 and 12 months post-baseline data collection)