Table 2 RE-AIM-based measures of MISSION-Vet service delivery
RE-AIM domain | RE-AIM indicator | RE-AIM indictor definition |
|---|---|---|
Adoption | Percent of case managers tried MISSION-Vet | The percent of consented case managers who entered at least one MISSION-Vet note |
Reach | Percent of case managers who delivered: | The number of unique DRT and Peer sessions received divided by the total number available (13 DRT + 11 peer sessions = 24 available MISSION-Vet sessions) |
 any MISSION-Vet sessions | ||
 10% of MISSION-Vet sessions | ||
 25% of MISSION-Vet sessions | ||
 50% of MISSION-Vet sessions | ||
Implementation | Percent Received workbook | The percentage of Veterans whom had at least one MISSION-Vet CPRS note stating they were given a MISSION-Vet workbook |
DRT sessions done | ||
 Number | The number of unique DRT sessions given to the Veteran divided by the total possible number of unique DRT sessions (i.e., 13) | |
 Percent | The number of unique DRT sessions given to the Veteran | |
Self-guided exercises done | ||
 Number | The number of unique self-guided exercises given to the Veteran | |
 Percent | The number of unique self-guided exercises given to the Veteran divided by the total possible number of unique self-guided exercises (i.e., 7) | |
Peer sessions done | ||
 Number | The number of unique peer sessions given to the Veteran | |
 Percent | The number of unique peer sessions given to the Veteran divided by the total possible number of unique peer sessions (i.e., 11) | |
Number of referrals | The number of unique referral categories (co-occurring, mental health, substance abuse, psychiatric, trauma, housing, vocational, Veteran, medical, and justice,) to which a referral was indicated. Unique referral categories were used rather than absolute number of referrals because review of the data made it clear the staff were frequently reporting the same referral on multiple notes. | |