Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of primary outcome variables

From: Multi-strategic intervention to enhance implementation of healthy canteen policy: a randomised controlled trial

Variable

Baseline

Follow-up

Intervention vs control at follow-up

Int. (n = 35)

Cont. (n = 35)

Int. (n = 27)

Cont. (n = 30)

Relative risk (95% CI)

P value

Canteen menu does not contain foods and beverages restricted for sale (‘red’ or ‘banned’).

School size

•Small

3 (33.33%)

4 (36.36%)

7 (77.78%)

1 (14.29%)

5.44 (0.86 to 34.55)

0.04*

•Medium/large

1 (3.85%)

2 (8.70%)

12 (66.67%)

0

30.26 (1.91 to 478.45)

<0.01**

Socioeconomic region (SEIFA 2006)

•Least advantaged

0

5 (31.25%)

9 (81.82%)

1 (7.69%)

10.64 (1.59 to 71.37)

<0.01**

•Most advantaged

4 (25.00%)

1 (5.26%)

10 (62.50%)

0

22.24 (1.41 to 350.79)

<0.01**

Healthy canteen items (‘green’) represent >50% of products listed on the canteen menu.

School size

•Small

0

1 (9.09%)

7 (77.78%)

3 (42.86%)

1.81 (0.72 to 4.57)

0.30

•Medium/large

5 (19.23%)

6 (26.09%)

15 (83.33%)

5 (22.73%)

3.67 (1.65 to 8.14)

<0.01**

Socioeconomic region (SEIFA 2006)

•Least advantaged

2 (13.33%)

4 (25.00%)

11 (100.0%)

4 (30.77%)

3.25 (1.44 to 7.35)

<0.01**

•Most advantaged

3 (15.00%)

3 (15.79%)

11 (68.75%)

4 (23.53%)

2.92 (1.17 to 7.32)

0.01*

  1. *p value less than 0.05; **p value less than 0.01