From: Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians
Item | Format | Yes | No | Not applicable | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Topic or relevant aspect of topic not included in a resource that should logically include it | Evidence-Expertise | Â | X | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
2 | Inadequacy of the resource’s index | Evidence-Expertise |  |  | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
3 | Resource poorly organized | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
4 | Resource not clinically oriented | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
5 | Resource not authoritative or not trusted | Evidence-Expertise | Â | X | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
6 | Resource not current | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
7 | Inability to interact with a general resource as one could with a human resource | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
8 | Incorrect information | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
9 | Information not current | Evidence-Expertise | Â | X | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
10 | Failure to anticipate ancillary information needs | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
11 | Failure to address common comorbid conditions | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | x | ||
12 | Inadequate differential diagnosis | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
13 | Failure to define important terms | Evidence-Expertise | Â | X | Â |
Case-Based | Â | X | Â | ||
14 | Inadequate description of clinical procedures | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
15 | Vague or tangential information | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
16 | Unnecessarily cautious writing style | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
17 | Tertiary care approach to primary care problem | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
18 | Biased information due to conflicts of interest | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
19 | Failure to address the clinical question | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
20 | Failure to study the comparison of interest | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
21 | Failure to study the outcome of interest | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
22 | Failure to study the population of interest | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
23 | Evidence based on flawed methods | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
24 | Failure to cite or include relevant evidence | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
25 | Inadequate synthesis of multiple bits of evidence | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
26 | Difficulty applying results of randomized clinical trials to individual patients | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
27 | Failure to directly or completely answer the question | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
28 | Answer too long or too short | Evidence-Expertise | Â | Â | X |
Case-Based | Â | Â | X | ||
29 | Answer directed at the wrong audience | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
30 | Difficulty addressing unrecognized information needs apparent in the question | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
31 | Answer not trusted | Evidence-Expertise | Â | X | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â | ||
32 | Answer inadequate | Evidence-Expertise | X | Â | Â |
Case-Based | X | Â | Â |