Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Teather |
| 17 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fiona Miller |
| 20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fiona Miller |
| 29 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Teather |
| 7 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 4 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Lane |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 4 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.