Skip to main content

Table 1 EPOC quality improvement strategies

From: What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review

 

N

%

Professional interventions

  

   Educational meetings

59

59.6

   Other quality improvement techniques (i.e., PDSA, process mapping flowcharts)

54

54.5

   Audit and feedback

30

30.3

   Distribution of educational materials

18

18.2

   Educational outreach visits

12

12.1

   Reminders

11

11.1

   Marketing

10

10.1

   Patient mediated interventions

5

5.1

   Local consensus processes

4

4.0

   Local opinion leaders

1

1.0

Financial interventions

  

   Provider oriented

9

 

Provider salaried service

4

4.0

Provider incentives

3

3.0

Fee-for-service

1

1.0

Institution grant/allowance

1

1.0

Patient oriented

0

0.0

Other

3

3.0

Organisational interventions

  

   Provider oriented

  

Clinical multidisciplinary teams

99

100.0

Case management

17

17.2

Continuity of care

16

16.2

Communication and case discussion between distant health professionals

12

12.1

Revision of professional roles

11

11.1

Satisfaction of providers with the conditions of work and its material and psychic rewards

11

11.1

Skill mix changes

10

10.1

Formal integration of services

6

6.1

Arrangements for follow-up

5

5.1

   Patient oriented

  

Presence and functioning of adequate mechanisms for dealing with client suggestions and complaints

12

12.1

Consumer participation in governance of healthcare organisation

1

1.0

   Structural interventions

  

Changes in physical structure, facilities and equipment

23

23.2

Changes in scope and nature of benefits and services

19

19.2

Changes in medical record systems

16

16.2

Presence and organisation of quality monitoring mechanisms

15

15.2

Staff organisation

9

9.1

Other

4

4.0

Changes in the setting/site of service delivery

2

2.0

Ownership, accreditation, and affiliation status of hospitals and other facilities

1

1.0

Regulatory interventions

  

   Management of patient complaints

4

4.0

   Peer review

1

1.0