Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - GEOFF LINDSAY |
12 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elaine Lockton |
3 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
21 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah James |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
12 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-95 |
You can find further information about peer review here.