Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley |
| 14 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ole Norheim |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 17 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - stephen maluka |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 17 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - stephen maluka |
| 20 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley |
| 21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ole Norheim |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 17 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - stephen maluka |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.