Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John N Lavis |
| 8 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katherine Fierlbeck |
| 24 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katherine Fierlbeck |
| 20 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John N Lavis |
| 23 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 17 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John N Lavis |
| 20 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 25 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 25 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 11 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 11 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-39 |
You can find further information about peer review here.