Skip to main content

Table 2 User ratings of Flottorp’s Criteria for the original CFIR

From: The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

Flottorp Criteria

Survey Item

Yes

N (%)

Partially

N (%)

No

N (%)

Uncertain

N (%)

N

Applicability

Applicable across different settings

86 (67.2)

19 (14.8)

2 (1.6)

21 (16.4)

128

Applicability

Applicable for different types of innovations

104 (81.3)

13 (10.2)

1 (0.8)

10 (7.8)

128

Simplicity

More complicated than necessary

20 (15.7)

54 (42.5)

50 (39.4)

3 (2.4)

127

Logic

Organized in a logical way that is easy to understand

73 (57.5)

50 (39.4)

3 (2.4)

1 (0.8)

127

Usability

Easy for implementation researchers to use

64 (50.4)

57 (44.8)

2 (1.6)

4 (3.1)

127

Usability

Easy for non-implementation researchers to use

20 (15.9)

46 (36.5)

37 (29.4)

23 (18.3)

126

Suitability

Suitable to identify and prioritize determinants

75 (59.1)

35 (27.6)

9 (7.1)

8 (6.3)

127

Usefulness

Useful for designing implementation strategies

83 (65.4)

33 (25.9)

4 (3.1)

7 (5.5)

127

Usefulness

Useful for reporting determinants

96 (76.8)

21 (16.8)

1 (0.8)

7 (5.6)

125

Clarity

Labeled/explained in a way that is easy to understanda

87 (76.9)

–

10 (8.8)

16 (14.2)

113

Comprehensiveness

Recommendations to add domains/constructsb

44 (41.5)

–

62 (58.5)

–

106

Relevance

Recommendations to remove domains constructsb

27 (28.1)

–

69 (71.8)

–

96

N/A

Helps compare findings across studies

74 (58.7)

29 (23.0)

4 (3.2)

19 (15.1)

126

N/A

Helps to advance or build theory

66 (52.4)

40 (31.7)

6 (4.8)

14 (11.1)

126

  1. aResponses included Yes, No, Uncertain
  2. bResponses included Yes, No