Skip to main content

Table 1 Included qualitative studies

From: The effectiveness and acceptability of evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development groups: a mixed-methods systematic review

Author (year, country)

Collection method

Participants

Format(s) evaluated

Topics

Babatunde (2018, England) [40]

Semi-structured interviews (and questionnaires)b

N = 21. Clinicians (11), researchers (5), epidemiologists (3), health service/trial managers (2)

Evidence flowers and summary table

Musculoskeletal conditions

Buljan (2020, Croatia) [41]

Focus groups

N = 20. Patient advocates (9), doctors (4), medical students (7)a

Plain language summary, infographic, scientific abstract

Breech presentation

Busert (2018, International) [42]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 18. Public-health decision-makers

4-page summary with Summary of findings (SoF) table and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) ratings

Food, alcohol, and tobacco portion/packaging

Dobbins (2004, Canada) [43]

Focus groups

N = 46. Medical officers (7), programme managers/coordinators (25), decision-makers (14)

Summary statement

Tobacco control

Hartling (2016, 2017, USA) [44, 45]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 8. Guideline developers (3), healthcare providers (3), research funders (1), health insurers (1)

‘Rapid products’ (evidence inventory, rapid response, rapid review)

Venous thromboembolism

Hartling (2018, Canada) [46]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 6. Decision-makers

3-page summary

Youth mental health

Marquez (2018, Canada) [47]

Semi-structured interviews (and survey) b

Semi-structured interviews

N = 11. Healthcare managers (5), policymakers (6)

N = 12. Healthcare managers (5), policymakers (7)

Summary prototype

Healthcare management/services

Mustafa (2015, International) [48]

Semi-structured interviews, workshop discussions

N = 20. Researchers, health professionals, guideline developers

3 formatsc of GRADE evidence tables

Diagnostic test accuracy reviews

Newbery (2013, USA)   [49]

Focus groups (with questionnaires)

Individual feedback (and questionnaires)

N = 15. Health insurer (2), insurance/former policymaker (2), clinicians (3), researchers (2), governmental research directors (2), research consultant (1)

N = 3. Community physicians

7 differently formatted executive summaries

Acute otis media

Opiyo (2013, Kenya)    [50]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 16. Multidisciplinary guideline development group members

SoF tables, graded-entry summary, normal systematic review

Newborn care, hand hygiene

Perrier (2014, Canada) [51]

Focus groups

N = 10. Family physicians

Case-based and evidence-based prototypes

Rosacea

Perrier (2014, Canada) [52]

Focus groups

N = 32. Primary care physicians

Two summary prototypes

Rosacea

Rosenbaum (2011, International) [53]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 18. Policymakers and managers

Short summaries

Healthcare management/services

Rosenbaum (2010, International) [54]

Semi-structured interviews (and workshops)

N = 21. Health professionals, researchers

SoF tables

Deep vein thrombosis

Smith, Totten (2019, USA) [55, 56]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 6. Department director (1), health system experts (4), guideline developers (2)

MAGICapp, Tableau

Chronic pain

Steele (2021, England) [57]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 7. Mental health clinicians

One-page summary, full systematic review

Mental health

Yepes-Nunez (2019, International) [58]

Semi-structured interviews

N = 32. Methodologists (21), meta-analysis users (5), clinicians (6)

SoF tables

Network meta analyses

  1. aPopulation and accompanying RCT not eligible. bNot eligible. cThere were 4 formats in total, but only 3 were shown to the user testing group. Abbreviations: United States of America (USA), Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (DACH), summary of findings (SoF), Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), MAGIC Making GRADE the Irresistible Choice)