Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of domain use of Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks (N=23)

From: A citation analysis and scoping systematic review of the operationalization of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)

Citation

Target population

Study setting

Study design

Methods used

Level of analysis

Program/intervention (O)

Program/intervention (P)

Recipients (O)

Recipients (P)

Implementation and sustainability infrastructure

External environment

RE-AIM used

Ameling, JM, et al. (2014) [35]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

O

QUAL

I

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Ayele, RA, et al. (2017) [36]

I, CM, DA

CIP, COP

CS

QUAL

S

  

X

X

X

X

 

Ekawati, FM, et al. (2019) [39]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

SAP

MIXED

S

X

  

X

   

Esses, SA, et al. (2019) [41]

I, CM, DA

CIP

RCT, PP

QUAN

I

X

X

X

X

   

Gopalan, G, et al. (2016) [42]

I, CM, DA

COM

O

MIXED

ML

X

X

X

X

X

X

IM

Gopalan, G, et al. (2014) [45]

DA, S

COP

O

QUAL

S

X

 

X

X

X

X

R, AS, AST, IM

Henderson, V, et al. (2020) [46]

I, CM, S

COP

PP

QUAN

I

X

X

 

X

X

  

Knudsen, HK, et al. (2020) [47]

DA

COM

NP, SAP

MULTI

DA

X

 

X

 

X

X

 

Leonard, C, et al. (2019) [48]

I, CM, DA, S

CT

CS

MIXED

S

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Liles, EG, et al. (2015) [26]

DA, S

COP

O

QUAL

S

X

 

X

 

X

X

E, IM

Linke, SE, et al. (2020) [50]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

SAP

MULTI

S

X

X

X

 

X

X

 

Paniagua-Avila, A, et al. (2020) [51]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

RCT, SAP

MULTI

S

X

X

  

X

  

Pittman, JOE, et al. (2020) [52]

I, CM

COM

PP

MIXED

I

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Satre, DD, et al. (2019) [53]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

PP, SAP

MIXED

S

X

X

 

X

   

Schneider, JL, et al. (2016) [54]

DA

COP

O

QUAL

DA

X

 

X

 

X

X

 

Scholin, L, et al. (2019) [55]

DA, S

NHI, COP

O

QUAL

DA

X

 

X

 

X

X

 

Shields, N, et al. (2020) [56]

I, CM, S

COM

RCT, COH, SAP

MULTI

S

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Ssewamala, FM, et al. (2018) [57]

I, CM, DA, S

SCH

RCT, SAP

MIXED

S

X

  

X

X

 

AS

Stephens, TN, et al. (2014) [59]

DA, S

COP

O

QUAL

S

X

X

X

 

X

X

R, AS, AST, IM, MI, MS

Sullivan, JL, et al. (2018) [60]

DA, S

CIP

O

QUAL

S

X

X

X

X

X

 

R, IM

Woodbridge, MW, et al. (2014) [61]

DA, S

SCH

CS

MULTI

S

X

X

 

X

X

X

 

Yakovchenko, V, et al. (2019) [62]

I, CM, DA, S

COP

RCT

MIXED

S

X

 

X

X

X

  

Zhang, R, et al. (2020) [63]

I, CM, DA

NHI, RE

O

MULTI

ML

X

X

X

X

X

X

 
  1. Target population: O organization, I individual (patient/participant), CM community member, DA delivery agent/provider, S setting
  2. Study setting: COP clinical out-patient, CIP clinical in-patient, COM community, SCH school, NHI national health initiative, CT care transitions, RE regional evaluation
  3. Study design: NP narrative piece, CS case study, COH cohort study, PP pre/post, RCT randomized controlled trial, SAP stand-alone protocol paper, O other
  4. Methods used: QUAL qualitative, MIXED mixed methods, QUAN quantitative, MULTI multiple methods
  5. Level of randomization/data collection: I individual (patient/participant), ML multi-level, DA delivery agent (provider/implementation staff), S setting
  6. RE-AIM used: R reach, E effectiveness, AS adoption: setting, AST adoption: staff, IM implementation, MI maintenance: individual, MS maintenance: setting