Skip to main content

Table 3 Post-intervention differences between trial arms for clinicians

From: Results of a multi-site pragmatic hybrid type 3 cluster randomized trial comparing level of facilitation while implementing an intervention in community-dwelling disabled and older adults in a Medicaid waiver

Outcome or mediator

IF mean change (SE)

IF + EF mean change (SE)

Difference between arms (95% CI)

p-Value differences between arms

Clinician self-efficacy

−2.34 (0.21)

−2.57 (0.30)

0.23 (−0.51, 0.97)

0.54

Clinician attitude — fit

*

*

*

*

Clinician attitude — limitations

0.00 (0.11)

−0.06 (0.11)

0.06 (−0.27, 0.39)

0.68

Clinician attitude — openness

0.08 (0.08)

0.00 (0.08)

0.08 (−0.13, 0.29)

0.45

Clinician attitude — monitoring

0.01 (0.14)

0.18 (0.14)

−0.17 (−0.66, 0.32)

0.44

Clinician attitude — requirements

0.15 (0.09)

0.09 (0.10)

0.06 (−0.22, 0.35)

0.64

Clinician attitude — employability

−0.17 (0.07)

−0.04 (0.11)

−0.12 (−0.36, 0.11)

0.29

Clinician attitude — feedback

0.10 (0.11)

−0.01 (0.12)

0.11 (−0.24, 0.47)

0.50

Clinician attitude — burden

0.13 (0.15)

0.04 (0.14)

0.09 (−0.42, 0.59)

0.69

Clinician attitude — appeal

0.06 (0.08)

−0.11 (0.08)

0.17 (−0.06, 0.41)

0.13

Clinician attitude — divergence

0.07 (0.09)

0.14 (0.09)

−0.07 (−0.31, 0.17)

0.57

Clinician attitude — balance

0.11 (0.11)

0.21 (0.10)

−0.10 (−0.47, 0.27)

0.54

Clinician attitude — total

−103.49 (0.92)

−103.52 (0.92)

0.03 (−0.08, 0.14)

0.70

  1. *Algorithm did not converge