Table 4 Outcome of the assessment of risk stratification, comparing clinician assessment to GAP and local recommendations
| Â | Site reference | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Risk status (by GAP) | Site 7 | Site 8 | Site 9 | Site 10 | Site 11 | All |
Agreement between GAP and clinician | High risk (n) | 32 | 24 | 21 | 32 | 24 | 133 |
Low risk (n) | 73 | 68 | 87 | 68 | 76 | 372 | |
Both n(%) | 105/120 (87.5%) | 92/117 (78.6%) | 108/121 (89.3%) | 100/117 (85.5%) | 100/120 (83.3%) | 505/595 (84.9%) | |
Clinician did not classify risk as recommended in GAP | High risk (n) | 9 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 14 | 48 |
Low risk (n) | 6 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 42 | |
Both n(%) | 15/120(12.5%) | 25/117 (21.4%) | 13/121 (10.7%) | 17/117 (14.5%) | 20/120 (16.7%) | 90/595 (15.1%) | |
If GAP classification is wrong, classified correctly as per local policy? | n(%) | 2/15 (13.3%) | 0/25 (0.0%) | 7/13 (53.8%) | 7/17 (41.2%) | 3/20 (15.0%) | 19/90 (21.1%) |