Table 9 Adaptations within process/implementation
From: Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research
Why did the adaptation occur? | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
What was adapted? | Fidelity | Improve feasibility (during planning: after planning) | Increase reach/engagement (during planning: after planning) | Increase satisfaction (during planning: after planning) | Improve outcomes (during planning: after planning) | Improve fit (during planning: after planning) | Other/NA (during planning: after planning) |
Recruitment (n = 43) | Consistent (n = 39) | 0:6 | 1:27 | 0:1 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 2:2 |
Inconsistent (n = 4) | 0:0 | 0:2 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:2 | |
Who is involved (n = 26) | Consistent (n = 26) | 2:12 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 1:0 | 0:1 | 1:9 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Follow-up (n = 21) | Consistent (n = 21) | 0:10 | 0:0 | 0:5 | 0:5 | 0:0 | 0:1 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Scheduling (n = 16) | Consistent (n = 16) | 1:5 | 0:10 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Time devoted (n = 6) | Consistent (n = 6) | 1:5 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Resources (n = 2) | Consistent (n = 2) | 0:1 | 0:1 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Content (n = 0) (n = 1) | Consistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 |
Inconsistent (n = 0) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |
Other/NA (n = 9) | Consistent (n = 8) | 1:3 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:1 | 1:2 |
Inconsistent (n = 1) | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:1 | 0:0 | 0:0 | 0:0 | |