From: Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research
Adaptation type (FRAME) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Process/implementation | Classes/program | Total | ||
FRAME adaptation descriptor | Process/implementation | 123 | 0 (N/A) | 123 |
Classes/program | 0 (N/A) | 79 | 79 | |
What was adapted | Follow-up or tracking | 21 | 1 | 22 |
Program content | 0 | 49 | 49 | |
Recruitment | 43 | 1 | 44 | |
Resources | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
Scheduling | 17 | 3 | 20 | |
Time devoted | 7 | 8 | 15 | |
Who is involved | 26 | 12 | 38 | |
Other | 6 | 0 | 6 | |
Why was it adapted | Increase reach/engagement | 36 | 5 | 41 |
Increase retention | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
Improve feasibility | 41 | 8 | 49 | |
Improve fit with recipients | 2 | 13 | 15 | |
Improve outcomes | 6 | 21 | 27 | |
Reduce cost | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
Increase satisfaction | 7 | 10 | 17 | |
Other or N/A | 6 | 12 | 18 | |
Outside forces/ “just happened” | 14 | 8 | 22 | |
Adaptation level (planning) | Planned (proactive) | 13 | 18 | 31 |
Unplanned (reactive) | 110 | 61 | 171 | |
Adaptation level (fidelity) | Within protocol | 116 | 46 | 162 |
Outside of protocol | 5 | 24 | 29 | |
Outside of protocol (condition specific) | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
Became within protocol | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Delivery level | Individual-patient | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Individual-practice member | 21 | 38 | 59 | |
Practice | 97 | 41 | 138 | |
Intervention group | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
All practices | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Context modifier | Format | 8 | 46 | 54 |
Setting | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
Personnel | 38 | 12 | 50 | |
Population | 25 | 1 | 26 | |
N/A | 46 | 19 | 65 | |
When did it occur | Proactive — planning | 11 | 9 | 20 |
Reactive — during or after 1st class | 43 | 30 | 73 | |
Reactive — later into implementation (after 2nd) | 29 | 9 | 38 | |
Unclear | 40 | 31 | 71 | |
For how long did it occur | Temporary adaptation | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Permanent adaptation | 103 | 50 | 153 | |
Evolving adaptation | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
Unclear | 13 | 20 | 33 |