Skip to main content

Table 5 Data captured in the adaptations tracking log

From: Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research

  

Adaptation type (FRAME)

 
  

Process/implementation

Classes/program

Total

FRAME adaptation descriptor

Process/implementation

123

0 (N/A)

123

Classes/program

0 (N/A)

79

79

What was adapted

Follow-up or tracking

21

1

22

Program content

0

49

49

Recruitment

43

1

44

Resources

3

5

8

Scheduling

17

3

20

Time devoted

7

8

15

Who is involved

26

12

38

Other

6

0

6

Why was it adapted

Increase reach/engagement

36

5

41

Increase retention

5

1

6

Improve feasibility

41

8

49

Improve fit with recipients

2

13

15

Improve outcomes

6

21

27

Reduce cost

6

1

7

Increase satisfaction

7

10

17

Other or N/A

6

12

18

Outside forces/ “just happened”

14

8

22

Adaptation level (planning)

Planned (proactive)

13

18

31

Unplanned (reactive)

110

61

171

Adaptation level (fidelity)

Within protocol

116

46

162

Outside of protocol

5

24

29

Outside of protocol (condition specific)

0

5

5

Became within protocol

2

4

6

Delivery level

Individual-patient

2

0

2

Individual-practice member

21

38

59

Practice

97

41

138

Intervention group

0

0

0

All practices

0

0

0

Context modifier

Format

8

46

54

Setting

6

1

7

Personnel

38

12

50

Population

25

1

26

N/A

46

19

65

When did it occur

Proactive — planning

11

9

20

Reactive — during or after 1st class

43

30

73

Reactive — later into implementation (after 2nd)

29

9

38

Unclear

40

31

71

For how long did it occur

Temporary adaptation

2

8

10

Permanent adaptation

103

50

153

Evolving adaptation

5

1

6

Unclear

13

20

33