Skip to main content

Table 1 Percentage of systematic reviews and stakeholder documents corroborating occurrence of CFIR-based implementation determinants

From: Meta-review of implementation determinants for policies promoting healthy diet and physically active lifestyle: application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Policy implementation determinants: CFIR domains and categories of determinants

Total: % (number of reviews/documents supporting the determinant

in all k = 42 reviews/documents)

Reviews vs. stakeholder documents comparisons

Diet vs. PA/SB comparisons (reviews and stakeholder documents)

Diet, PA, SB policies in schools: % (number of reviews/documents supporting the determinant in k = 10 reviews/documents)

Reviews: % (number of reviews supporting the determinant in k = 25 reviews)

Stakeholder documents: % (number of documents supporting the determinant in k = 17 documents)

Diet: % (number of reviews/documents supporting the determinant

in k = 12 reviews/documents)

PA/SB: % (number of reviews/documents supporting the determinant in k = 9 reviews/documents)

Domain: Policy characteristic

Intervention source

2 % (1 out of 42)

4 % (1 out of 25)

0

0

0

0

Evidence strengths

33 % (14 out of 42)

24 % (6 out of 25)

47 % (8 out of 17)

42 % (5 out of 12)

0

0

Relative advantage

21 % (9 out of 42)

28 % (7 out of 25)

12 % (2 out of 17)

8 % (1 out of 12)

22 % (2 out of 9)

30 % (3 out of 10)

Adaptability

24 % (10 out of 42)

24 % (6 out of 25)

24 % (4 out of 17)

8 % (1 out of 12)

11 % (1 out of 9)

20 % (2 out of 10)

Triability

2 % (1 out of 42)

4 % (1 out of 25)

0

0

0

0

Complexity

33 % (14 out of 42)

56 % (14 out of 25)

0

33 % (4 out of 12)

78 % (7 out of 9)

70 % (7 out of 10)

Quality (design, package)

17 % (7 out of 42)

28 % (7 out of 25)

0

25 % (3 out of 12)

11 % (1 out of 9)

30 % (3 out of 10)

Cost

76 % (32 out of 43)

76 % (19 out of 25)

77 % (13 out of 17)

83 % (10 out of 12)

67 % (6 out of 9)

70 % (7 out of 10)

Mean % across determinants from policy characteristic domain

26 %

30 %

20 %

25 %

24 %

28 %

Domain: Outer setting

Target groups’ needs and resources

55 % (23 out of 42)

48 % (12 out of 25)

65 % (11 out of 17)

33 % (4 out of 12)

44 % (4 out of 9)

60 % (6 out of 10)

Networking with other organizations

69 % (29 out of 42)

64 % (16 out of 25)

77 % (13 out of 17)

75 % (9 out of 12)

56 % (5 out of 9)

60 % (6 out of 10)

Peer pressure

10 % (4 out of 42)

16 % (4 out of 25)

0

17 % (2 out of 12)

11 % (1 out of 9)

0

External policies

71 % (30 out of 42)

64 % (16 out of 25)

82 % (14 out of 17)

83 % (10 out of 12)

56 % (5 out of 9)

60 % (6 out of 10)

Mean % across determinants from outer setting domain

51 %

48 %

56 %

52 %

42 %

45 %

Domain: Inner setting

Structural character

67 % (28 out of 42)

68 % (17 out of 25)

65 % (11 out of 17)

58 % (7 out of 12)

78 % (7 out of 9)

90 % (9 out of 10)

Networks, communication

52 % (22 out of 42)

40 % (10 out of 25)

71 % (12 out of 17)

50 % (6 out of 12)

44 % (4 out of 9)

40 % (4 out of 10)

Culture, norms, values

60 %* (25 out of 42)

64 % (16 out of 25)

53 % (9 out of 17)

58 % (7 out of 12)

33 % (3 out of 9)

60 % (6 out of 10)

Implementation climate

74 % (31 out of 42)

80 % (20 out of 25)

65 % (11 out of 17)

67 % (8 out of 12)

78 % (7 out of 9)

80 % (8 out of 10)

Readiness for implementation

74 % (31 out of 42)

72 % (18 out of 25)

77 % (13 out of 17)

67 % (8 out of 12)

44 % (4 out of 9)

80 % (8 out of 10)

Mean % across determinants from inner setting domain

65 %

65 %

66 %

60 %

56 %

70 %

Domain: Individual characteristics

Knowledge, beliefs

76 % (32 out of 42)

84 % (21 out of 25)

65 % (11 out of 17)

83 % (10 out of 12)

89 % (8 out of 9)

90 % (9 out of 10)

Self-efficacy

26 % (11 out of 42)

44 % (11 out of 25)

0

17 % (2 out of 12)

33 % (3 out of 9)

70 % (7 out of 10)

Stage of change/enthusiasm

38 % (16 out of 42)

56 % (14 out of 25)

12 % (2 out of 17)

33 % (4 out of 12)

67 % (6 out of 9)

70 % (7 out of 10)

Identification with organization

5 % (2 out of 42)

8 % (2 out of 25)

0

8 % (1 out of 12)

0

0

Motivation, values, capacity

60 %* (25 out of 42)

72 % (18 out of 25)

41 % (7 out of 17)

42 % (5 out of 12)

78 % (7 out of 9)

70 % (7 out of 10)

Mean % across determinants from individual characteristics domain

41 %

53 %

24 %

37 %

53 %

60 %

Domain: Implementation process

Planning

26 % (11 out of 42)

24 % (6 out of 25)

29 % (5 out of 17)

17 % (2 out of 12)

33 % (3 out of 9)

10 % (1 out of 10)

Engaging leaders, external agents, champions

55 % (23 out of 42)

64 % (16 out of 25)

41 % (7 out of 17)

42 % (5 out of 12)

56 % (5 out of 9)

80 % (8 out of 10)

Executing plans

12 % (5 out of 42)

16 % (4 out of 25)

6 % (1 out of 17)

8 % (1 out of 12)

11 % (1 out of 9)

10 % (1 out of 10)

Reflecting and evaluating

50 % (21 out of 42)

40 % (10 out of 25)

65 % (11 out of 17)

42 % (5 out of 12)

44 % (4 out of 9)

40 % (4 out of 10)

Mean % across determinants from implementation process domain

36 %

36 %

35 %

27 %

36 %

35 %

  1. Note: PA physical activity, SB sedentary behavior, CFIR Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. %—the percentage of the reviews/stakeholder documents that reported the occurrence of respective CFIR-based domain/category of implementation determinants. Total—reviews/stakeholder documents (k = 42) addressing implementation determinants for healthy diet, PA/SB policies. Reviews—reviews (k = 25) addressing implementation determinants for healthy diet, PA/SB policies. Stakeholder—stakeholder documents (k = 17) addressing implementation determinants for healthy diet, PA/SB policies. Diet—reviews/stakeholder documents (k = 12) addressing implementation of healthy diet policies across various populations/settings. PA/SB—reviews/stakeholder documents (k = 9) addressing implementation of PA/SB policies across various populations/settings. Schools—reviews/documents (k = 10) addressing implementation of healthy diet or PA/SB policies for school settings. The percentages of implementation determinants that were corroborated in ≥ 50.0% up to 59.9% of reviews/stakeholder documents (considered preliminarily supported) are italicized. The percentages of implementation determinants corroborated in ≥ 60% of analyzed reviews/stakeholder documents (considered strongly supported) are in bold font. *in the case where between 55.5 and 59.99% of reviews/stakeholder documents supported the occurrence of a determinant, they were rounded to 60%; however, they were not considered an indication of strong support because the actual values were lower than 60.0%