Table 4 Comparison of organizational contextual factor (OCF) scores between QI and SOC groups
Organizational contextual factors | QI arm (N = 8) | SOC arm (N = 8) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (%) | Range (%) | Mean (%) | Range (%) | ||
Physical infrastructure | 78.9 | (66.7–90.5) | 64.7 | (42.9–80.0) | 0.058 |
Key staff | 95.8 | (85.7–100) | 92.0 | (80.0–100) | 0.270 |
Flexibility of clinic hours | 66.9 | (25–100) | 65.5 | (0–100) | 0.900 |
Monitoring data for improvement (MDI) | 63.3 | (38.9–100) | 65.0 | (41.7–100) | 0.875 |
Leadership support | 46.0 | (25.0–75.0) | 57.4 | (25.0–100) | 0.265 |
Supportive context for change (baseline)# | 77.5 | (72.6–78.8) | 79.0 | (74.1–84.6) | 0.248 |
Supportive context for change (month 12)# | 76.2 | (73.4–81.8) | 79.7 | (72.1–92.0) | 0.128 |
Degree of integrated HIV-TB services (baseline)# | 77.1 | (72.8–82.9) | 76.7 | (66.7–82.4) | 0.916 |
Degree of integrated HIV-TB services (month 12)# | 74.1 | (68.4–80.2) | 80.1 | (76.7–81.7) | 0.916 |