Table 1 Required and recommended criteria for pragmatic measures
Glasgow and Riley criteria | Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS) |
|---|---|
Important to stakeholders | Items and constructs were reviewed by practitioners, supervisors, and other researchers before data collection |
Burden is low for both respondents and staff | Measure is freely available and takes less than 5 min to complete |
Actionable | Easy to score and interpret |
Sensitive to change | Items are phrased to be sensitive to change and valid across the spectrum of sustainment |
Broadly applicable | Can be used across different settings and EBPs |
Use for benchmark, has norms to interpret, or addresses public health goals | Informs sustainment of a practice in specific settings so that norms can be developed and addresses public health |
Unlikely to cause harm | No sensitive information collected |
Psychometrically strong | Rasch Measurement Theory and Classical Test Theory support reliability and validity |
Related to theory or model | Covers constructs of EPIS model and existing constructs and definitions of sustainment |