Skip to main content

Table 6 Practitioner self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and perceived acceptability questionnaire scores before and after training

From: Implementing a digital intervention for managing uncontrolled hypertension in Primary Care: a mixed methods process evaluation

Scale

Individual items where not treated as a scale

Response options

Before training median (range)

After training median (range)

Wilcoxon z score

95% CI for mean difference scores

Prescriber self-efficacy (n = 67)

a. Create individualised patient medication plans

1–10

9 (1–10)

10 (1–10)

− 5.20

0.59 to 1.30

b. Increase patient medication when blood pressure remains too high

9 (1–10)

10 (1–10)

− 3.06

0.13 to 0.68

c. Integrate the HOME BP programme in to regular care

7 (1–10)

9 (2–10)

− 5.95

1.41 to 2.38

Prescriber outcome expectancies mean score (n = 67)

 

1–5

4.00 (3–5)

4.17 (3.33–5.00)

− 5.09

0.19 to 0.36

Prescriber perceived acceptability of the intervention for patients (n = 67)

a. Self-monitor their blood pressure at home

1–10

7 (5–10)

8 (5–10)

− 4.96

0.62 to 1.30

b. Enter their blood pressure readings in to HOME BP

7 (1–10)

8 (5–10)

− 4.72

0.80 to 1.65

c. Make medication changes to control their blood pressure

6 (1–10)

8 (5–10)

− 5.57

1.23 to 2.28

Supporter self-efficacy mean score (n = 57)

 

1–10

7.67 (2.33–10)

9.33 (6.67–10)

− 5.55

1.32 to 2.33

Supporter outcome expectancies mean score (n = 57)

 

1–5

4.17 (3–5)

4.5 (3–5)

− 4.34

0.16 to 0.38

Supporter perceived acceptability of the intervention for patients mean score (n = 57)

 

1–10

6.67 (1–10)

8.33 (3.67–10)

− 4.82

0.88 to 2.00