Table 3 Study assessments

Performance Monitoring measure (primary)

Adapted Routine Decision-Making scale [37]

X

X

X

X

X

X

Adapted NCJTP Relationship Assessment Inventory [38]

X

X

X

Adapted NCJTP Goals/Mission scale [38] (primary)

Agreement (kappa) among respondents within counties on ratings of the importance of providing mental health treatment services for justice-involved individuals

X

X

X

X

X

X

Use of same screening/assessment instruments across agencies in the county

X

X

X

Total score of 18+ on the NCJTP Relationship Assessment Inventory [38]

X

X

X

How many justice-involved individuals received any mental health service and how many received any substance use service in the agency in the past year

X

X

X

Questions asking whether each listed EBPP is available to justice-involved individuals in the county

X

Funding increases and decreases

Staff numbers, roles, training

NCJTPS’s Assess Your Resources scale [38]

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

As assessed above

X

Self-report and Stepping Up records

X

Matching score used to choose matched comparison counties

X

Questions asking whether the county shares (a) their mental health administrator, and/or (b) justice administrators with other counties

X

NCJTP About Your Organization scale [38]

X

Adapted NCJTP Staffing scales [38]

X

Adapted NCJTP Assess Your Organizational Culture scale [38]

X

State mental health diversion funding, legislative reforms

X